Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven benbow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was: Speedily deleted by Syrthiss. - Mike Rosoft 12:35, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Steven benbow
This is your standard "author-removed CSD" case, which people more wedded to process than I have deemed "a controversial deletion" (I would argue that the author of a rogue article who removes the CSD and does little to show why it was erroneous is continuing their fun, rather than engaging in controversy). An anonymous editor who may well be the original author has announced that this is all factual on the article's talk page. Suffice it to say that it patently is not. BigHaz - Schreit mich an (Review me) 12:04, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom, complete nonsense. (letting off a little steam in the nom there, BigHaz?) Yomangani talk 12:08, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * No remotely plausible claim of notability, borderline patent nonsense. Delete, candidate for speedy deletion. Removal of deletion notice or other contesting of the deletion is only relevant in case of proposed deletion, so I am re-adding it. - Mike Rosoft 12:10, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, please. ~ PseudoSudo 12:15, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.