Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven pottorff


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy delete as non-notable. Based on the Google research, it is unlikely that there is any way a future article will be kept either, until such time as the subject moves beyond "up and coming". Turnstep 22:26, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Steven pottorff
Contested A7 speedy. Author provides no information indicating how this individual meets WP:MUSIC or WP:BIO. Google search provides no viable hits other than a personal website. Delete as per Wikipedia is not a self-promotion device and Verifiability. --Allen3 talk 16:51, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Is there anyway we can edit this article so that it may be fit for Wikipedia inclusion criteria and no longer be considered for deletion? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wikisteven (talk • contribs).
 * Comment Provide some links which verify that he is notable in some way. Fan1967 17:07, 1 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete I can find absolutely nothing on this guy on google, with the possible exception of the Xanga profile above, which matches the full name, but says nothing about being a musician. Fan1967 17:07, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash;WAvegetarian&bull; CONTRIBUTIONS TALK &bull; EMAIL &bull; 17:11, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete As it is at the moment it doesn't meet WP:MUSIC & seems to meet the criteria for speedy deletion CSD A7.-- blue 520  17:13, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. From looking at the user name and the self references in older versions of the article userfying a early version may be a option.-- blue 520  17:21, 1 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. J.J.Sagnella 18:01, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - no claims of notability. Any article that contains the phrase "up and coming" is basically ripe for deletion.  Wickethewok 18:56, 1 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.