Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven van Belleghem


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:32, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Steven van Belleghem

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet criteria of WP:GNG or WP:BIO. Claims about his achievements are sourced to his own marketing copy. The award his book has won comes from an organisation that itself does not appear to be notable (there is no article here nor in the Dutch-language Wikipedia). I can't find significant discussion of him in multiple reliable sources. ... disco spinster   talk  14:31, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ...  disco spinster   talk  14:31, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. ...  disco spinster   talk  14:31, 5 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom. In addition, I suspect that the original author might have an undisclosed conflict of interest, as the image of the subject is marked as the author's own work. Jmertel23 (talk) 17:01, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete likely promotional bio that fails WP:GNG. Best, GPL93 (talk) 18:44, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. A quick check of the Belgian press brings up too little to establish notability (there are rather more hits for a manager at AB InBev, who seems to be a different person with the same name). --Andreas Philopater (talk) 22:49, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as promotional. In addition, I don't like the sideways photo. ~ EDDY  ( talk / contribs )~ 00:47, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable person in advestising.John Pack Lambert (talk)
 * Delete Article feels more like a promotional blurb.TH1980 (talk) 04:17, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - there are zero reliable sources on the page. Page creator is a newbie who doesn't seem to understand what significant coverage means. Bearian (talk) 20:52, 7 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.