Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steves

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete, apparently as a speedy. Carried out at 05:02, 29 Dec 2004 by User:Andrewa who wrote ''Steves is a crude term for one who practices buggerery. The lexography stems back to Friar Clark, 1006AD''

Closing the discussion. Rossami (talk) 03:58, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Steves
Dicdef, probably hoax. P Ingerson 03:25, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Speedy deletion candidate for obvious vandalism as an insult/taunt page. Geogre 04:03, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep it. It's an obscure genovian reference. -Me.
 * Please sign your posts properly, IP 69.76.158.32, and incidentally your vandalism of other pages has been reverted. Andrewa 05:11, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Speedy vandalism. Rje 04:28, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Deleted. Entire content was Steves is a crude term for one who practices buggerery. The lexography stems back to Friar Clark, 1006AD, previous version read 106AD. Andrewa 05:05, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.