Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steveston-London Secondary School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Star  Mississippi  11:57, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Steveston-London Secondary School

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

fails the general notability guideline by miles. sources found in a quick search are trivial mentions. ltb d l (talk) 04:12, 24 September 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:15, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Canada. ltb d  l (talk) 04:12, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:06, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:58, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes WP:GNG, as do pretty much all secondary schools in western countries. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:15, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 * @necrothesp: prove it. with sources. ltb d l (talk) 14:29, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify Keep. has found 10 sources from newspapers.com that, in my assessment, show the subject to meets WP:GNG. As with many other secondary schools in the Richmond School District, they are under-sourced and written poorly. As opposed to deletion, these articles should all be drafted until additional sources are gathered to meet WP:GNG . Sink Cat (talk) 03:25, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Because in my admin judgement, draftify doesn't make sense when sourcing (thanks Grand'mere Eugene) has been identified. Please assess those sources to determine whether they're sufficient for the school to remain. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  22:46, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify Keep. I clipped 10 sources from newspapers.com and listed them on the article's talk page, demonstrating the subject's notability for . However, the state of the current article is pretty bad, and other editors are welcome to use these sources in a WP:HEY effort. For now, I agree with  that the appropriate action is to draftify It does needs a complete overhaul, but the available sources demonstrate it is a notable subject.. — Grand&#39;mere Eugene (talk) 21:21, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I completely agree with this assessment. I've looked at the other articles in the school district as well (some are full on stubs), and put banners on the ones that needed additional citations or work done. Sink Cat (talk) 03:13, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.