Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stevie Awards


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Even if the reliable sources brought forth do not amount to much "significant" coverage, there is no consensus to delete the article.  Jamie ☆ S93  03:05, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Stevie Awards

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable award. No coverage in reliable secondary sources independent from the awards or the awarded. Hipocrite (talk) 13:14, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Reaffirming my nomination in light of the excessively trivial mentions added. There is no significant coverage of these non notable awards in reliable sources independent of the subject. Hipocrite (talk) 16:52, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:09, 12 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  KuyaBriBri Talk 18:51, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I like this idea, it's a good one, but it doesn't yet seem to show notability. Change my mind? -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 19:49, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * ...okay, so it really is notable. Well, fine, be that way, Stevie Awards!  Keep. =) -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 01:33, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've added a few citations, and there's plenty of RS material out there.  A brief sampling.  Many more are available. Cool3 (talk) 21:10, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep based on references added. Edward321 (talk) 02:25, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Appears to be a notable award. Niteshift36 (talk) 07:56, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * Keep based on references added. Edward321 (talk) 02:25, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Appears to be a notable award. Niteshift36 (talk) 07:56, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.