Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stewart Addington Saint-David


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Note that I am also speedy deleting his two books. If non-trivial independent reliable sources can be presented than this can of course be recreated at that time. JoshuaZ 19:55, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Stewart Addington Saint-David

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This was PRODed as "self-promotional". It is certainly over-wrought and "puffy", but there are independent sources, and some real claims of notability. Still, Delete, as he fails WP:BIO, pending other opinions. Xoloz 15:30, 4 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - Brazenly self promotional but little to back up the assertions, I'm pretty sure that pretty pictures of coats of arms aren't mentioned in WP:BIO, I'm sure I would have remembered. --WebHamster 17:24, 4 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions.   —David Eppstein 03:30, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:VERIFY--AmerHisBuff 09:38, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per AmerHisBuff. --Crusio 10:17, 9 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.