Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stewart G. Nagler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 03:43, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Stewart G. Nagler

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable businessperson. The only decent ref is a small obituary note in NYT, not enough to impart any lasting notability  Jupitus Smart  02:58, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  Jupitus Smart  02:58, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions.  Jupitus Smart  02:58, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:54, 4 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete As per nomination; article is also barely a stub, if that.TH1980 (talk) 05:18, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Half of the references are from MetLife and the article is only a stub. Nigos (t@lk • Contribs) 11:29, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - Not sure what the above are talking about. This is a good WP:Permastub for a dead guy that is non-promotional. This is the reason WP:NOTCLEANUP was written.  Cheerio042 (talk) 20:15, 4 July 2019 (UTC)  Striking blocked sock Britishfinance (talk) 10:43, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete The obituary is a paid one placed by the family and is not a RS. A businesswire press release also does not establish notability. Reywas92Talk 21:34, 4 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.