Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stghm

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 14:02, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)

Stghm
Stghm appears to be a vanity article, and I move that it be deleted. Jeff Anonymous 05:54, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete as nn vanity. -  Banyan Tree  06:01, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * delete, pointless article Michael Ward 06:06, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Very vain nn little 11-yr-old. Shame shame. -- Riffsyphon1024 06:06, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * And everybody knows your name! Sorry.  I couldn't resist.  Delete as vanity. - Lucky 6.9 06:37, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 06:38, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sometimes I just can't figure out the motivation behind these things... grendel|khan 16:32, 2005 Mar 17 (UTC)
 * Delete vandal-in-training. Denni &#9775; 20:12, 2005 Mar 17 (UTC)