Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stig Severinsen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - § FreeRangeFrog croak 05:05, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Stig Severinsen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Reason StNicksRocks (talk) 06:56, 27 March 2014 (UTC) The article reads like an advertisement. It is not written in a NPOV and does not cite sufficient 3rd party material to verify the veracity of its content.
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 March 27.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 07:15, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:13, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:13, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:13, 27 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. I've done some cleaning up and toning down - and updating. He has further world records after those mentioned. I am surprised by how much coverage there is in the (online) press; I have added some, will look for more, and I believe he meets GNG. Yngvadottir (talk) 18:13, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep -- Obviously. The article meets WP:GNG and WP:BIO criteria. Any issues with language, style or sourcing have been well-addressed by Yngvadottir. (Nominator should have read WP:BEFORE and have tagged this article for improvement rather than submitted for AFD). — Cactus Writer (talk) 15:30, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.