Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stilt (company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 06:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Stilt (company)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An advertorially toned page on a minor tech startup; significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is PR driven or otherwise does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH, as in "Stilt is revolutionizing the way individuals with limited or zero credit history get loans in the U.S. at lower rates than other lenders". The company has been accepted into Y Combinator in 2016, which strongly suggests that it's WP:TOOSOON for this company to have an encyclopedia entry. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:09, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - There doesn't seem to be enough coverage of this in reliable, independent sources. This means that the information does not meet our standard for verifiability, and thus should be deleted. RileyBugz 会話 投稿記録  01:59, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 10:34, 24 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: An article originally by a blocked sockpuppet and subsequently edited by another WP:SPA. The start-up batch coverage is not evidence of attained notability, nor are the associated Columbia alumni sources. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 10:34, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Increased coverage of the company in notable, independent, and highly reputable sources like Forbes, Y Combinator, and SEC meeting WP:CORPDEPTH. The company has also raised a significant Seed round of funding in the fintech space.  rm2904 23:30, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. User that commented 'keep' above me has no other entries than the article in question and this comment. -Snorre/Antwelm (talk) 22:08, 30 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.