Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stinky Peterson (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Stinky Peterson
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unnecessary dab. On each series, the characters were either secondary (Hey Arnold, Recess) or unseen quartenary character (Red Green). I see no point in a dab if none of them will ever be worthy of having an article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:33, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep as I would support a redirection to a show or character list if there was only one Stinky Peterson, but with three of them, the disambig is the best way to go.  Frank Anchor Talk 18:36, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions.  —TexasAndroid (talk) 21:14, 27 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Works as a disambig becuase you know them rabid fanboy types, can't keep them from changing stuff. treelo  radda  23:28, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as a topic that could be a redirect to any of the articles mentioning the characters so needs to be disambiguated even if none of the topics would have an article of their own. -- JHunterJ (talk) 02:25, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Why on Earth would we want to delete a page dedicated to helping direct our users to the correct information? We do these specificly so our readers are aware there is more than one entity of the same name and allow them to choose the best one. I'm unclear why deletion is needed here. We have redirects specifically to get folks to the article they seek. Here we have elegantly bundled three in one.  -- Banj e  b oi   22:19, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.