Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stir


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 05:34, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Stir
This was a contested speedy brought to DRV; deleting admin did not oppose relisting. The rational for deletion is a failure of WP:MUSIC. Xoloz 16:50, 26 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - Eagletalk 16:47, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, barely passes WP:Music, has a relevant allmusic profile -- T B C [[Image:Confused-tpvgames.gif|18px|]] ???   ???   ??? 17:37, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, per TBC. Though I don't know about cementing in any consciousness. :) -Dawson 20:32, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, I don't see how this passes WP:MUSIC. Roy  boy cr ash  fan  [[Image:Flag of Texas.svg|30px]] 00:57, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 02:16, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:MUSIC with plenty of media mentions.   --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 02:32, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, agree with above post. The article is more compliant with NPOV requirements. Band has charted as high as 8 in the US.  Krakrjak 04:01, 27 March 2006 (UTC) (Note: This is the author of the article.)
 * Keep. Seems notable enough. Marskell 11:44, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Two albums (although only one with a major label) plus a number 8 in mainstream rock chart seems to be notable enough on two counts of WP:MUSIC (okay maybe 1 1/2 :). With references included for charting, crtitical praise, claims, etc, and the "cemented themselves" phrase rewritten, it looks fine to me now. Regards, MartinRe 12:10, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, sufficiently notable. --Sam Blanning (formerly Malthusian) (talk) 15:51, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep -- With additional information added regarding international songwriting competition, radio broadcasts, and additional projects by band members (of which one is already an established Wiki page), this should easily meet WP:MUSIC. AMstir 14:13, 27 March 2006 (UTC)  (Note: This is a suspected sockpuppet.)
 * Keep since it clearly passes WP:MUSIC... (2 albums, ranked #8 on billboard chart, signifgant radio play, etc) ---J.Smith 05:50, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:MUSIC. Mangojuice 13:41, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, Train might be notable, Stir aren't as far as I can tell.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.