Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stirling Elevator


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Stirling, Alberta. Courcelles (talk) 18:58, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Stirling Elevator

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A modern concrete grain elevator built six years ago is not notable. No reliable sources are provided to confirm notability otherwise. This good faith creation simply is not notable.

''Note: This and similar articles were PRODed and no objections were received within seven days, but this and the others were objected shortly thereafter before they were reviewed by an admin, hence this now being an AfD. The reason for the objection was "Because the articles seem to have merit". '' Hwy43 (talk) 21:22, 27 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Hwy43 (talk) 21:27, 27 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep/merge This seems to be a substantial and significant structure. The worst case is that we'd merge into Stirling,_Alberta per WP:ATD and WP:PRESERVE. Andrew D. (talk) 21:41, 27 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and for failing WP:GNG. The Prairies are filled with grain elevators. There's nothing unusual about it; this one, also in Alberta, looks bigger. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:14, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Elevators aren't notable structures. 117Avenue (talk) 04:15, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge (or simply delete) at best if appropriate as I'm not seeing much improvement for this one. SwisterTwister   talk  06:44, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:55, 2 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete This is simply a large grain elevator. There is nothing in the article to indicate it is notable, and no sources are provided. Nothing significant to merge. --MelanieN (talk) 02:02, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Selective merge to Stirling,_Alberta. It's worth a mention, but no more than a couple of sentences.  -- RoySmith (talk) 12:35, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - local, non-notable landmark. No sources could be found to show it meets WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:07, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just a local landmark, but no historical or architectural significance. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:19, 5 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.