Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stock's Gambit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. The content is obviously nonsensical and unverifiable. Being a queen down with no compensation is not a "gambit" but a blunder. Sjakkalle (Check!)  10:04, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Stock's Gambit

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Pretty much a hoax and fails the made up one day test. Shadowjams (talk) 09:14, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:01, 17 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - Wikipedia is not for something you made up two days ago. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 18:48, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Should be a Speedy delete as no indication of importance.--Pawnkingthree (talk) 19:22, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I PRODed it, but the author removed it. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 19:24, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Ask yourself why this isn't a speedy category. Shadowjams (talk) 09:39, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete technically doesn't fit any of the speedy criteria, but come on, it's something literally made up in school one day, specifically, that day being three days ago. No need to give it another week to pointlessly sit there. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  20:31, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Made up to entertain friends at school. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 00:03, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. I would say that this fits the criteria of  .  The creator is new to wikipedia but should be warned against creating hoax articles Quale (talk) 00:56, 18 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment I think Snowball clause applies; and it can be deleted. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 01:27, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Blatant hoax, wow, White is a queen down after three moves. That one's certainly gonna make it into all standard text books. --Pgallert (talk) 08:06, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.