Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stock Fraser Cukier


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  Sango  123    (e)  19:43, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Stock Fraser Cukier
Non-notable lawfirm. Shows no notability. Computerjoe 's talk 17:50, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Not notable. DarthVad e r 22:18, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * No question that this is linkspam; Google news search on "Stock Fraser Cukier" results in zero hits. The only possible claim to notability that I could find (which wasn't in the article) is that they have acted as an agent for the House of Lords in an international law dispute.  Note, however, that hundreds (if not thousands) of other law firms could make the same claim.  I'm not sure whether WP:CORP applies to lawfirms; if it does, they appear fail it.  I'm going to give this one a delete as spam and not particularly notable.  ergot 14:10, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable, not encyclopedic, adspam. TheMadBaron 21:13, 17 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.