Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stockholm (album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was KEEP.  Rob e  rt  T 04:09, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

Stockholm (album)
Album article that fails to mention any of the artists. I found no album of this name at CDNOWZeimusu | Talk page 09:19, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong "nobody better dare disagree" keep. The CD exists, and is by Jean-Louis Aubert.  I have corrected the article, and uploaded an image of the album cover.  Zeimusu, although you may have got it wrong in this case, I do applaud your efforts in trying to verify this album's existence.  Would that all AfDers tried so! fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 11:16, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep I dare disagree just a teeny bit :-) I say delete all albums with less than 1,000,000 sales. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] :: AfD? 11:55, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - but... Stockholm is also an album by The Triffids, so at the very least something will need to be done about the page's title. Grutness...  wha?  13:02, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable album by notable artist and move to Stockholm (Jean-Louis Aubert album) or similar with this as a disambiguation page with a link to the Triffids album. Albums do not have to sell a million to be influential. For example, none of the Velvet Underground's did. Never Mind the Bollocks by the Sex Pistols may now have just sold a million but it is a closerun thing. The Sun Sessions featuring Elvis Presley's early work at Sun Records would be struggling to reach a million yet these are hugely influential records. Besides, such an arbitrary limit would be a systematic bias against artists from smaller countries such as Australia and New Zealand. Capitalistroadster 17:14, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
 * The fact that we have articles on other unencyclopedic subjects is not an argument to keep this one. In fact, I'm going to go AFD Never Mind the Bollocks right now! - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 19:30, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, of course, as it's an album by a noteworthy artist. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 19:30, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Existance and notablity seems to be established. Changing my opinon Zeimusu | Talk page 08:40, 9 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.