Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stockland Bathurst


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 22:37, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Stockland Bathurst

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable shopping centre with no availability of reliable sources to prove otherwise. Till I Go Home (talk) 11:07, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:25, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 29 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Major shopping centre in large regional centre, plenty of reliable sources available should someone choose to expand. Rebecca (talk) 01:39, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * No. This isn't a major shopping centre, it's a local shopping mall with 45 stores. I have already pointed out with the links above that the centre has no reliable sources available &mdash; did you even read my rationale for deletion? Till I Go Home (talk) 08:58, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * see WP:MUSTBESOURCES. Seems just a vote. LibStar (talk) 14:23, 2 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as lacking independent coverage in independent sources. Feel free to ping my talk page if such sources are included in the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:53, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
 * delete no evidence of significant coverage to meet WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 14:23, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.