Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stockport cricket club

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep (no consensus). Sjakkalle (Check!)  10:02, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

Stockport cricket club
not notable. Also follows Geogre's rule. Dunc|&#9786; 16:53, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete no claim to notability, and goonn -Harmil 17:16, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. As notable as schools and as these articles: Oxford University Walking Club Lancaster City F.C., Leigh RMI F.C. & Holker Old Boys F.C.. (What is Geogre's rule?) -- RHaworth 18:57, 2005 July 10 (UTC)
 * Comment the semi-professional conference-level football teams are notable, the walking club is now on vfd. Local cricket clubs are, like you say, are probably as notable as a primary schools and donut shops.  Hence they should be deleted to avoid this place filling with crap.  Dunc|&#9786; 20:29, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
 * I think Geogre's rule is something to do with newbies not knowing that wikipedia's search is case-sensitive. Kappa 19:15, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
 * It's Geogre's Law. Uncle G 01:01, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment - Is it bad that I saw the pronoun in that glossary entry and knew you had written it? -- Jonel | Speak 04:00, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per RHaworth. Kappa 19:15, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - nn, at the very least should be cleaned up (peacock term). Add a claim to notability, then my vote will change to keep, but until then, I'm sticking with delete. -mysekurity 19:49, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, it's a cricket club. It needs a good cleanup.  And someone should perhaps teach the author Geogre's rule how to use the Page Move facility. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 22:33, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment - Geogre's Law notes correlation and would probably do quite well in empirical testing of incidences. Just because uncapitalized terms are not always non-notable doesn't mean the observation is incorrect. -- Jonel | Speak 04:00, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, unless cleaned to become notable and NPOV. If it is, I'll change but this is the kind of thing that survives a VfD and then sits there not going anywhere. -Splash 22:48, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, much more comparable to a local business than to a school. Dcarrano 23:26, July 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep... I guess... I don't think it's particularly important, but I don't really think it needs deleting! --Deskana 00:48, 11th July 2005 (GMT)
 * Keep No reason why Wikipedia shouldn't cover this sort of thing. CalJW 02:03, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep cricket clubs are inherently notable. -- Jonel | Speak 04:00, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete notability not established. JamesBurns 08:39, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, notability not established. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 15:00, July 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as above, no reason for this sort of thing to not be in Wikipedia Robdurbar 17:53, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, notability not established. carmeld1 21:04, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. brenneman (t) (c)  00:07, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete very bad and i am the creator of it. if deleted it would not bother me and i would try to improve on a new version. Jimmyb
 * Delete, notability not established. - Nabla 04:27, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.

Reopened
This has been reopened at Votes for deletion/Stockport cricket club 2 with (1) a better explanation of its utter unnotability within the structure of English cricket, and (2) contention that consensus from the above debate was delete, not keep. Dunc|&#9786; 13:42, 22 July 2005 (UTC)