Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stolen (Armstrong novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  01:59, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Stolen (Armstrong novel)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Same as Broken (Armstrong novel). No independent sources. Sungodtemple (talk &#8226; contribs) 20:07, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Sungodtemple (talk &#8226; contribs) 20:07, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:11, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. The inside cover of one of Armstrong's other novels, Exit Strategy, contains excerpts from reviews of Stolen by the New York Times, Quill & Quire, the Toronto Star, Toronto Globe and Mail and London Free Press, which would mean it easily fulfills WP:NBOOK #1. The Quill and Quire review is available online.  Unfortunately, the archives of the other newspapers are all behind paywalls, so I can't verify them myself (but anyone with a Toronto library card should be able to access the Star and Globe and Mail). We shouldn't consider a book non-notable just because it was published before the modern Internet. --Tserton (talk) 12:57, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Reviewed by Kirkus among others. Insufficient BEFORE. pburka (talk) 13:42, 18 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.