Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stolen Dimensions Films


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 01:18, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Stolen Dimensions Films

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This page came up as a "Random article". It was a mess, so I tidied it up, realisng as I went on that there was nothing genuinely notable and it was a suitable case for nomination for deletion. The article was created in June 2006 by MJB12, which is almost certainly the Matt Brown referred to in the article, and probably, by my reading, his age at the time! The article is about an "an independent film making label" (i.e Matt and his mate) who have an impressive selected filmography of 16 films in the space of four years (and that really is selected since the article claims over 50 films to their credit!). This company's high point seems to be not the Venice Film Festival, not Sundance, but the Cherry Creek High School 2006 Film Festival. So, we basically have two 9 - 12yo kids with a camera who knock stuff out an incredible rate with no indication of notability (unless you count 2nd prize in a school contest?) Emeraude (talk) 20:14, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as completely non-notable. Nice find. Sideways713 (talk) 21:02, 14 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 15:29, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:29, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:29, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:29, 19 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete under A7 - no indication of importance. --Rob Sinden (talk) 15:40, 19 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per failing notability standards... but (sorry Rob Sinden) not as an "CSD-A7", as their "indicator of importance" is that they made films (CSD A7 is distinct from verifiability and reliability of sources, and is a lower standard than notability... which yes, this article fails. Some of their films can actually be found shared on various social networks (just watched Be My Valantine over at Myspace), but the films have not received coverage and neither have the young filmmakers.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 21:33, 19 February 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.