Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stolensidekick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was merged to How NOT to steal a SideKick 2; all information could already be found at the other article, so this is in fact a redirect. There's already a (much bigger) AfD on the other article. Early closing due to WP:SNOW, and to make the final decision in a single spot (the other AfD). --cesarb 11:24, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Stolensidekick
Non-notable article. &mdash; Super-Magician (talk &bull; contribs &bull; count ) &#x2605; 21:51, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete pn this is not a notable event, just a blog story  + + Lar: t/c 23:58, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I find it interesting that someone commented in the discussion page of the article that popularity makes something less notable. Alyeska 00:37, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I did not read what they were saying that way, I read it that they were claiming notability because it was popular (insofar as you can glean meaning from an invocation of a nonexistant template... )  + + Lar: t/c 02:21, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I believe you misunderstood the comment, Alyeska. It said that the article is notable, not non-notable.  Besides, the author of the page made that comment.  &mdash; Super-Magician (talk &bull; contribs &bull; count ) &#x2605; 13:47, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with How NOT to steal a SideKick 2 (currently on AfD); the other AfD discussion is much more active, and the articles are about the same thing. --cesarb 18:02, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete: Total cruft about nn internet meme., nn website, nn event. Most of the allegations and events in this article, and the website it refers to, are hearsay and unverified. There is nothing encyclopedic about this article. Agent 86 18:06, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Quite unverifiable. Wickethewok 21:13, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Fails WP:MEME miserably. GassyGuy 21:54, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:MEME. -- Vary | Talk 22:13, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy merge. - RoyBoy 800 20:58, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and Delete: Merge into How NOT to steal a SideKick 2, if that isn't shortly deleted too. --Tim1988 talk 16:39, 11 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.