Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stone Court


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Five Star.  Ron h jones (Talk) 00:10, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Stone Court

 * – (View AfD) (View log · AfD statistics)

House that has no claim of meeting WP:N other than being the house where a celeb lived back in the late 80s. Delete Secret account 16:16, 4 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:18, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:58, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to Five Star. I agree that the house does not appear to have any independent notability. Ray  Talk 19:34, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge. Clear WP:NOTINHERITED. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 11:47, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. The coverage in Hello magazine and elsewhere seems to indicate notability. -- Eastmain (talk) 06:51, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The trouble is that all of these claims to notability relate to the pop group, not the building they live in. WP:BLP1E advises that people notable for only one event should go into the article about the event, and similarly, I'd argue that buildings notable only for only one lot of famous residents should go into the article about the famous residents. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 10:27, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.