Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stone of the Guanches


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. - NQ (talk)  10:56, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Stone of the Guanches

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Clearly clearly non-notable  Varun FEB2003    11:37, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * VarunFEB2003, do you have an actual deletion rationale as to why you think this topic is "Clearly clearly non-notable"? --Oakshade (talk) 15:05, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Archaeology-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:47, 14 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep: I see no reason to delete an article on an archaeological artefact (described as "elemento excepcional" in the subheadline of the given newspaper reference). In what way is this "clearly" lacking in notability for an encyclopaedia? AllyD (talk) 14:17, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. sufficient references for an article of this type.  DGG ( talk ) 08:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 *  Varun FEB2003    07:04, 17 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.