Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stoneman and Volk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete &mdash; Caknuck (talk) 06:51, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Stoneman and Volk

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The speedy deletion request is contested by the author. However, nothing indicates that this relatively small law firm (as mentioned in the article) would be notable enough for having an article. No reliable, third-party, published sources are provided. Delete. Edcolins (talk) 20:10, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per nom (unless someone can establish notability under WP:CORP, in which case the appropriate assertion of importance can be added). —Caesura(t) 22:59, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:CORP. Twenty Years 03:40, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete -- searching the Internet, I could find nothing that established notability. -- A. B. (talk) 17:50, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletions.   -- Gavin Collins (talk) 16:07, 7 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.