Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stonerichstudio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy Delete by User:Secret CSD A7 (Corp): Article about a company that doesn't assert significance (non-admin close). — Travis talk  19:18, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Stonerichstudio

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable. Niaz (Talk •  Contribs)  15:47, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

I wrote an article about a company called Stonerich studio. I do not work for them, i created everything myself with their permission. Why is it up for deletion? There are no sources since its my own writing, I would lke to keep the article, it is not advertising anything, it just talks about the studio and the artist, there are other similiar pages up here. Please explain the problem so I can fix it. Romeo R. Smithen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stonerichstudio (talk • contribs) 15:59, 10 January 2008

Ok So how do I become a notable person? I would really love to have the article displayed like on Google and other search engines as a wikipedia article Romeo R. SMithen —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stonerichstudio (talk • contribs) 16:08, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Please note that it doesn’t work like that. Applicable policies and guidelines: external links, conflict of interest, notability (general), and notability (companies) — Travis talk  16:41, 10 January 2008 (UTC)


 * comment - "I do not work for them"? According to the article you wrote, you are their Marketing Director! -- Orange Mike  |  Talk  16:27, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - see no reason why it shouldn't be a speedy. Why the AfD, Niaz?-- Orange Mike  |  Talk  16:23, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * comment Almost the entire article is copied from myspace. Algebraist 16:35, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * comment User:Stonerichstudio (a copy of this page) has been nominated at MFD. Algebraist 16:43, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * strong delete - blatant advertising, non-notable.--ukexpat (talk) 16:49, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * comment - Do I smell snow in the air? -- Orange Mike  |  Talk  16:52, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as blatant spam / advertising by someone who works for the company and then lies about it (or you were lying in the first place, either way not so great).-- Oni Ookami Alfador Talk 16:54, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete This is exactly the sort of reason G11 exists. As an additional note, I can't help noticing that both here and here "Romeo R. SMithen" claims not to work for Stonerichstudio, yet claims in the article to be their marketing director and also to own the copyrights to their logos.  They can't both be true, and hopefully any potential customers or clients take this conduct into consideration before choosing to do business with either Romeo R. SMithen or Stonerichstudio.  Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:44, 10 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.