Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stones (rapper)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:01, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Stones (rapper)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Commenters beware, this article is deceptively referenced. The artist in question fails WP:MUSIC and lacks non-trivial coverage by reliable third party publications. Blogs, youtube, myspace, et cetera are not acceptable sources for biographies of living people. JBsupreme (talk) 18:22, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: Biography section removed as a copy/paste of this. Jennavecia  (Talk)  18:40, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I am the creator of the article in question and feel like I am being treated unfair. I understand that Wikipedia frowns upon copyright law violations but at the same time I frown upon being accuse as a law-breaker. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HipHopDoc (talk • contribs) 19:04, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Then don't break the law, and be thankful that others have politely fixed your mistake. Delete for failing wp:music policy. P HARMBOY  ( TALK ) 01:29, 10 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete--no notability that can be independently verified--just blogs, MySpace, etc. Drmies (talk) 00:27, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete fails a number of WP:MUSIC criteria as well as the more general notability and  verifiability ones. Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:02, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  18:44, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Couldn't find any evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources. Given that the creator of the article is fairly new to Wikipedia, however, I think some of the comments towards them have been a little WP:BITEy.--Michig (talk) 20:17, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * If you're referring to the responses toward the copyvio, I see nothing wrong with them. We don't take the enforcement of copyright law seriously enough here, in my opinion.  :-( JBsupreme (talk) 20:55, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 14 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.