Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stonnar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 11:11, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Stonnar

 * — (View AfD)

Contested WP:PROD. I had deleted it, but I take the re-creation as ex post facto contest. Listing here as a procedural matter. Mackensen (talk) 15:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The article merely states that the title is another name for an erection. If this were the case, then this would warrant a redirect, as a duplicate article about the same thing.  It is Wiktionary, not here, where every different word gets its own article.  But I can find no evidence that this is, in fact, a word that is another name for an erection.  Indeed, I can find no evidence that this is in fact a word at all. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and this is not a word.  Delete. Uncle G 19:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as made up nonsense. Zero related g-hits and no references. meshach 23:49, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per UncleG. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:29, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete boredteencruft. Danny Lilithborne 22:48, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Made up in Fife one day. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Unverified/OR. -- I sl a y So lo mo n  |  t a l k  18:45, 9 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.