Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:19, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

Stood
I don't think this is a speedy (for which it was tagged as an "elementary dicdef", but I'm not sure it's ever going to be an encyclopedic article, either. -Splash talk 03:28, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * delete - dicdef isn't a speedy delete criteria, but this article is still a dicdef and already covered on Wiktionary, so it serves no purpose here. Peyna
 * Delete dicdef. Denni &#9775; 03:36, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Stood should be deleted as a dictdef with no potential as an encyclopedia article. Capitalistroadster 03:51, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Better yet, Wikipedia is NOT a dictionary. This can't be expanded into an article. Delete. - Mgm|(talk) 10:20, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. --Optichan 16:37, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete; unexpandable dicdef, already on Wiktionary. MCB 20:59, 25 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.