Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stoogecat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted  by User:Anthony.bradbury per WP:CSD: Patent nonsense and WP:CSD: Blatant hoax. Non-admin closure. KuyaBriBri Talk 20:37, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Stoogecat

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable (and possibly non-existent) slang expression. WP:NEO problems. Warrah (talk) 18:14, 13 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as an unsourced neologism. I HATE these things. There should be CSD criteria for these and other WP:MADEUP-violating pages. But there's not, so we have to go the long way. And by PROD or by AFD, either way the article gets to stay up for an entire week. A little insignificant Giving thanks to all that is me 18:19, 13 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete I would almost file this under WP:CSD - it's a pretty blatant hoax/vandalism. I guess kudos to Warrah for AGF.  --SquidSK (1MC•log) 18:25, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I decided to be bold and put a CSD tag over the AfD tag. This looks pretty blatant to me, especially considering the user's history and the last paragraph of the article.  --SquidSK (1MC•log) 18:29, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.