Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stop Drinking Soda


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete (already deleted when I closed it). --Michael Snow 05:49, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Stop Drinking Soda
Third anti-caffeine, anti-soft drink rant up here recently. Original research, not encyclopeadic, neologism. delete Kiand 18:10, 23 May 2005 (UTC)


 * Agreed. delete. --   &mdash; I. Neschek |  talk 18:20, 23 May 2005 (UTC)


 * Clean Up I think it needs be put in a way that doesn't advertise it, it's ok just edit it a little bit. [--User:64.12.117.12 ]
 * Anonymous users (and sock-puppet registered user accounts) can't vote. Kiand 19:28, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Wrong. Anybody can vote -- look it up. There's an understanding that anonymous votes have less weight. And of course you can't use a sockpuppet to vote twice. That's it. In any case, you should trust the admins to interpret the rules, especially when the outcome of the vote is a foregone conclusion. Isaac R 21:02, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, rant. --W(t) 19:25, 2005 May 23 (UTC)
 * Delete, wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a collection of original research health advice articles (note: I do agree with advice to stop drinking soda). Thue | talk 19:41, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Double Blue  (Talk) 20:05, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: Advocacy is out of place here. Geogre 20:53, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete (and drink more beer) --Doc (t) 21:15, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete this article that was created as part of a goofy addiction/food related campaign by an anonymous user (aka Andrew Lin) using several IPs. - Jersyko 22:07, May 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy deleted as a recreation of previously-deleted nonsense. One has to wonder why User:128.2.247.45 created the article then immediately turned around and slapped a VfD header on it.  RickK 22:41, May 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * To waste people's time? -- Cyrius|&#9998; 06:28, 24 May 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.