Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stop Islamophobia Week


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Muslim_Public_Affairs_Committee_UK. Black Kite (talk) 19:13, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Stop Islamophobia Week

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

All sources in article are primary, I was unable to find any 3rd party sources, doesn't meet WP:GNG so delete then redirect to MPACUK (who founded it). Loomspicker (talk) 21:29, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep It was founded by a notable organization and the sources seem plausible to me. What counts as a third party sources is sometimes a grey area and in such circumstances we can look for google hits for notability and the number of high-profile politicians who comment on it makes me think this is not non-notable. Pass a Method   talk  22:12, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Please present the sources you believe to be third-party including reports of policitians comments on it.--Loomspicker (talk) 21:01, 22 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - No sources means a failure of the general notability guide, none of the refs in the article qualify as a reliable source. When searching for sources, it is't very promising when hit #1 is to the Wikipedia article itself and #2 is to the organizer's website. Tarc (talk) 13:08, 21 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - No coverage anywhere. Article is mainly a collection of statements on Islamophobia and anything relevant could be merged there. PhilMacD (talk) 15:18, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 22 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Muslim_Public_Affairs_Committee_UK. Not enough sources for a standlone article but would be OK as a subsection of the parent organization with a redirect. We can verify it exists and is something someone might search on. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 17:43, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge back to Muslim Public Affairs Committee UK as it is their campaign. This is effectively the same solutiuon as Green Cardamom is offering.  Peterkingiron (talk) 14:02, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The Muslim Public Affairs Committee UK is a notable body, but this individual campaign does not seem to have gained much in the way of substantial independent coverage. Therefore, anything cited should be merged into the section in the organisation's article.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:37, 28 October 2013 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.