Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stoq (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Davewild (talk) 18:11, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Stoq
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Still nothing to indicate WP:notability. Sources given are either directory entries or do not mention it. Previous AFD ended as no consensus. noq (talk) 23:59, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 00:44, 27 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG.  Sources offered are WP:PRIMARY or otherwise unsuitable.  I looked through the various Google searches and found nothing helpful.  Msnicki (talk) 01:25, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:47, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: sources don't demonstrate the impact. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 16:04, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete This framework was supposedly re-written in February 2012 or 4 months ago. But it doesn't seem to have been a notable product since this article has been here since 2008 --Artene50 (talk) 23:31, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.