Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Storage Made Easy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 07:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Storage Made Easy

 * – ( View AfD View log )

promotional article based entirely upon non reliable sources, such as mere notices, or promotional  interviews in sources that specialize in publishing PR. The Forbes item is by a "former contributor", and therefor now recognized not to be a RS,  DGG ( talk ) 22:09, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  22:28, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  22:28, 10 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been [ previously PROD'd]. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Logs:

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   13:58, 18 January 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment The earlier now deleted version of article was made by a declared paid editor " done for a third-party online agency" without the detailed specification as now required --it wasn't required when the article was started in 2013. The current version was made by an spa who has edited essentially nothing else, and somehow managed to create this in mainspace before being autoconfrmed.  DGG ( talk ) 18:32, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete paid crap, fails GNG. SK2242 (talk) 18:52, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 11:39, 29 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.