Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Storj Labs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  20:43, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Storj Labs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Promotional. Fuddle (talk) 13:34, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Fuddle (talk) 13:34, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 14:11, 4 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete: An article on a start-up company, describing their product's features and sourced from announcements with quotations and interview Q&As from the CEO, etc. The best sources appear to be the Forbes item from 20 May, in which several paragraphs summarise the product proposition, and Thomas Claburn's piece in The Register ("Got a few spare terabytes of storage sitting around unused? Tardigrade can turn that into crypto-bucks: Just not very many – don't go all Bitcoin farming on this", 14 May 2020). While these are more independent reviews, I would still see them as start-up proposition evaluations and insufficient to demonstrate attained WP:NCORP notability. AllyD (talk) 14:27, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per AllyD. Does not appear to be notable. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 21:30, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per AllyD, doesn't meet WP:GNG --DannyS712 (talk) 02:33, 6 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Not enough coverage to meet WP:NCORP. Jmertel23 (talk) 17:27, 7 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.