Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Storm 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. --Ezeu 05:09, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Storm 2
I believe this article qualifies for deletion based upon the "completely idiosyncratic non-topic" reason. It has no redeeming qualities and verges on patent nonsense; I tried checking all the other pages it linked to, to see if I could merge it into one of those pages, but it only links to disambiguation pages and pages which have absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand (if there is one). Simba 08:43, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. (Liberatore, 2006). 12:26, 27 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep and Add Context. Other Robot Wars competitors have their articles (Tornado (robot), for instance.).  This particular robot seems no less notable than any of the other winners. Tevildo 12:47, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. A Robot Wars winner is notable, but this article is in bad need of cleanup. Improve it, and it would be a Strong Keep. --DarkAudit 14:57, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and clean up I loved the robot fighting shows. That's not really why I'm voting keep (I'll just go with "per above"), but I wanted to make that known. I liked the robots and the action on BattleBots a lot more, but the show itself (the announcers, the stories, etc.) was crap. -- Kicking222 16:20, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable, not sourced, very poorly written Joan-of-arc 23:53, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - whilst I acknowledge that this article is not good enough for use on Wikipedia as it is, I am organising a group of Wikipedians who are/were Robot Wars enthusiasts to clean up this rather disorganised category from the ground up. Therefore, information within this article could help us when we come to sort out the articles for notable robots. CountdownCrispy 15:36, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.