Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Storm Bugs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  22:54, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Storm Bugs

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not convinced that these guys meet WP:GNG or WP:MUSIC. There appears to be some third party coverage at The Sound Projector, but I am not convinced this meets the notability criteria. Prod removed without explanation by unregistered SPA in October 2007. I thought I'd bring it here for the wider consensus. Thanks, sparkl!sm hey! 17:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   —sparkl!sm  hey! 18:01, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. I couldn't find a lot of coverage, but this provides some useful info, if perhaps not from a recognized reliable source, and this includes reprinted coverage of Philip Sanderson's post-Storm Bugs work from The Wire. Allmusic has one of their albums as an AMG album pick (although there's no review there) |BUGS&sql=11:3pfixq95ldde~T21, they were mentioned in The Guardian as a post-punk band that is now "the focus of cult worship". A substantial list of releases also - seems reasonable to have an article here, but some good sources would help a lot.--Michig (talk) 20:26, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 03:18, 19 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak keep per Michig's sources and arguments. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 03:27, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, passes WP:MUSIC per the ref's Michig has bought forward.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 06:39, 19 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.