Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Storm Team 2 Weather App


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   closed as moot. Article has been deleted by User:HJ Mitchell. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 17:13, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Storm Team 2 Weather App

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I could not find significant coverage in reliable sources (WHAT IS A RELIABLE SOURCE?) to indicate notability of/for this topic. — m o n o  04:16, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom; no news coverage for ("Weather App" "Storm Team") or ("Weather App" WGRZ) either. Melchoir (talk) 06:08, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Here is coverage of the Weather App taken directly from WGRZ's website: http://www.wgrz.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=78425

The reason this was added is because it is noteworthy for the station- basically this is the first station in the Buffalo area that has used iPad technology to create more interactivity. No offense- but if you had reviewed the links provided, this clearly indicates information on the app and its features. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Babyox4420 (talk • contribs) 22:14, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

This nomination makes no sense. I clicked on the links provided in the article, and the information was right there- directly from the tv station. The product link also matches exactly. The nomination should be taken down and the article should stay in its current form. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.180.135.42 (talk) 22:38, 22 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete This is not notable. The reference given above is not news coverage, it's a product announcement which can't be used to establish notability. I spent a few minutes cleaning up the references on the page so I could better understand, and having checked all of them, I just don't see anything to establish this particular app as notable. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 23:42, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete—A quick search on Google brought up no significant reliable coverage for the app itself. I can live with the one-sentence mention currently on WGRZ as long as it is coupled with the references given in the current article (it currently is not). Airplaneman   ✈  00:08, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Done. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 01:26, 23 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and above. What's the point of this!? Big  top  04:20, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Or maybe actually speedy delete - may be considered spam; see Criteria for speedy deletion, criteria G11 for possible advertising. I'll try to tag that article as such. Big  top  04:28, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.