Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Storybooth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 07:57, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Storybooth

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Potentially non notable web content provider. Sources seem a bit unreliable but I cannot decide which is why I have put it here for discussion. Has won a couple of awards but the sources are vague regarding that. Thank you.    Kadzi    (talk) 12:47, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:03, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Logs:


 * Delete Due to the questionable sourcing and because I don't think the awards are purely enough on their own to warrant an article. YouTube channels are a dime a dozen. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:06, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * You sure? Because storybooth is very famous and I think they deserve their own article. SophieHadifz (talk) 13:54, 11 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.