Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Straight A's


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 04:04, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Straight A's

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NFO, WP:NFSOURCES and WP:SIGCOV. I found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. I did a WP:BEFORE and found nothing suitable or reliable enough to pass WP:NEXIST. The Film Creator (talk) 00:20, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. The Film Creator (talk) 00:20, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment I mean there's this, that's about all I can find. This in Collider , and in Variety Nothing in Gnewspapers, I don't think the movie did much of anything after it was released. Oaktree b (talk) 13:56, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep I think it just barely makes it to notability. Oaktree b (talk) 13:59, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

I speedy withdraw per consensus. The Film Creator (talk) 02:57, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep You have also this and this for example. The film was internationally distributed (with 2 different titles in Brazilian and European Portuguese, fwiw). Production has attracted some attention; notable cast and director.—  MY, OH, MY!   (mushy yank) — 15:22, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets our notability guideline. Lightburst (talk) 22:27, 15 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.