Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Straight Silver


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. One (talk) 05:09, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Straight Silver

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

1 sentence stub giving no context on an apparently non notable book. No WP:RS thrown up in google search. Possibly worthy of a note in another article but there is no information to merge, thus this would be improper. HJMitchell   You rang?  20:20, 3 May 2009 (UTC)  HJMitchell    You rang?  20:20, 3 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. It might be notable, but that isn't demonstrated by reliable sources. A quick google search doesn't throw any up. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 22:09, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  --  I 'mperator 23:32, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. A non-notable Warhammer 40K book - no coverage in reliable sources. If anyone fancies a read, here's a excerpt:. Fences and windows (talk) 23:54, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge. It's only one line and that line can go in another entry. -moritheil Talk 03:43, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Whatever fate is reserved for this article, the following should get the same:
 * --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 04:38, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable and non-encyclopedic. JCutter (talk) 23:09, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 04:38, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable and non-encyclopedic. JCutter (talk) 23:09, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable and non-encyclopedic. JCutter (talk) 23:09, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:09, 11 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete no claim of notability, no actual notability. Resurr Section (talk) 04:44, 11 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.