Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strange Visitor from Another Planet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 18:40, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Strange Visitor from Another Planet

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only three reviews mentioned, the third (TV Fanatic) fails WP:RS. Kailash29792 (talk)  15:49, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:03, 17 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep, more reviews/recaps/other coverage can be found if needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matt14451 (talk • contribs)
 * Please sign your posts. --  Alex TW 06:00, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Den of Geek - http://www.denofgeek.com/tv/supergirl/38679/supergirl-episode-11-review-strange-visitor-from-another-planet. Paste Magazine - https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2016/01/supergirl-review-strange-visitor-from-another-plan.html. Nerdist - https://nerdist.com/supergirl-recap-strange-visitor-from-another-planet/ Matt14451 (talk) 20:58, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Where in the article are those sources? Every television episode gets reviews - what separates this one? (And just a heads up, make sure you're logged in so you don't double vote. Cheers.) --  Alex TW 00:06, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * How is that relevant to this discussion at all? Don't personally attack. Those sources aren't in the article, hence why I posted them in response to the OP saying there's only three reviews.Matt14451 (talk) 06:41, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Always sign your comments when you post them, there is no reason not to. Thank you. And again: Every television episode gets reviews - what separates this one? --  Alex TW 06:42, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * It has reviews, therefore proving notability. Not every episode of every TV show has as many reviews.Matt14451 (talk) 06:46, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Reviews do not equal notability, especially only a mere three of them. All episodes have reviews. So again: Every television episode gets reviews - what separates this one? --  Alex TW 06:48, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * There's not "a mere three of them" though. There's three in the article and I linked an additional three making six. Why are certain episodes only allowed articles, it is notable regardless of other articles. Matt14451 (talk) 06:54, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Reviews do not equal notability. All episodes have reviews. --  Alex TW 07:03, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Not all TV show episodes have reviews, especially not six from reputable outlets. What else proves notability? Matt14451 (talk) 07:05, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I recommend you read GNG and further understand Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. --  Alex TW 07:07, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Just read WP:GNG again. There are six secondary sources that are from unique publications and authors. Notability is proved. Matt14451 (talk) 15:10, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete/redirect Unnecessary article. --  Alex TW 06:00, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg  jhp  jm  01:20, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - other coverage, agreeing with Matt14451, some covering real-world politics and character reveals/reversals. Might want to add to other lists like the other Supergirl AfDs. StrayBolt (talk) 20:43, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - As already said, this has notability and reliable sources to stand on it's own. Not sure why any of these Supergirl episodes have been nominated recently. Should be as closed as with other AfDs. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 00:29, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - Just noticed that many other Supergirl episodes were nominated for deletion for the same or similar reasons, all were closed with the consensus being to keep them. There's nothing different about this AfD than all the others. Matt14451 (talk) 10:44, 29 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.