Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strategic sustainable development


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  → Call me  Hahc  21  02:31, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Strategic sustainable development

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Overly promotional, and I can't see how to reduce it, or that it is more than borderline notable enough for a separate article. "many leading experts"; jargon; references only to the proponent's own work; multiple links to this article from every conceivable topic;  written by an obvious COI author "SSDconsult"; and the main content is the Advantages section, which by its very nature  is pure advertising.  DGG ( talk ) 00:52, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 10 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete without prejudice to recreation, perhaps by a non-COI editor. This appears to be a fairly clear case of WP:PROMO as asserted by the nom. Only two sources are cited both of which fail WP:RS due to POV. The subject is probably notable, but this article is just not salvageable. It would have to be rewritten more or less from scratch to get it up to snuff. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:00, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete It's a group of organizations. Difficult to argue to keep, unless it passes notability, which is doubtful. It's not encyclopedic. They should copy this off wiki, to their own website. Invested editors should work on a related article instead. Agree with above. - Sidelight 12 Talk 00:51, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.