Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strawberry Blonde Productions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:18, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Strawberry Blonde Productions

 * — (View AfD)

Subject of this article, although not blatant advertising, does not appear to be an especially notable company. – ClockworkSoul 14:41, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

I can't argue against the point "especially notable company". The fact is it is a small company if you base it on man-power. However surly it is better the have credible, reliable article rather than no article, it may not assit everyone, but it may assit one person. (My apologies if I have edited this discussion page incorrectly, I am still learning Wikipedia) – JKimbley 15:14, 16 December 2006 (GMT)


 * Speedy delete as blatant advertising (not sure why the nom doesn't think so). - 24.60.23.232 17:20, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:CORP WP:NN TonyTheTiger 18:32, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Tony. TSO1D 20:00, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Well it looks like everyone has decided to delete it. I appreciate ClockworkSoul for being the only one to be able to give a valid reason for deletion, don't forget to delete the logo too. – JKimbley 10:07, 17 December 2006 (GMT)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.