Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strawinsky and the Mysterious House


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If the meme is notable, then the meme should have a page. The film itself, based on the discussion, does not itself appear to be notable. Primefac (talk) 19:08, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Strawinsky and the Mysterious House

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable film who's only claim to notability is a non-notable meme CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  23:08, 24 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep The meme behind Strawinsky and the Mysterious House is absolutely a notable meme. This meme causes the article as a whole to reach a level of notability sufficient for status in a Wikipedia article. The meme has been discussed extensively, and the film is, as a result, fully deserving of a Wikipedia article. From my perspective, this appears to be a case of excessive deletionism. SuperChris (talk) 12:08, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Not sure where this criteria came from but the meme isn't notable nor is the film. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  18:08, 25 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep I agree with SuperChris. - Alumnum (talk) 18:52, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Based on what? I will gladly withdraw this nomination if anyone can provide sources that satisfy our inclusion criteria because I can't find a single one. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:18, 27 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep I agree with SuperChris too. Strawinsky and the Mysterious House is a strongly notable meme. DarthonTheOverseer (talk) 17:51, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Is anyone going to back this up with an actual source that supports this? Or are we just going to keep saying the same thing over and over with no proof? CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  18:45, 28 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Strawinsky and the Mysterious House has not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. —SpanishSnake (talk) 16:56, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 02:43, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 02:43, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:01, 1 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - Before CHRISSY MAD  explodes, delete is the correct answer per nom. Online searching reveals nothing that can be used as a reliable source. Reviews are all user/purchaser/non-independent sourced. Like the other deletes I'd happily change if someone can start posting suitable sources, nothing either stated here or visible online functions as such. Nosebagbear (talk) 14:38, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
 * delete My input on the subject is the same as before. 💵Money💵emoji💵 Talk 11:36, 2 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep 2x Here is proof: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vel-CyHrvb4 DarthonTheOverseer (talk) 14:15, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * First of all, you can't vote twice. Second of all, Simply providing a link, which only shows that the subject exists, will almost never actually help out the article at AFD. 💵Money💵emoji💵 Talk 14:18, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * You keep asserting that this is notable and have yet to provide a single source which supports your claim. By those standards, my dog is notable. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  14:27, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Here is real proof: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/WesternAnimation/StrawinskyAndTheMysteriousHouse There. DarthonTheOverseer (talk) 17:50, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Have you ever read WP:RS or WP:COVERAGE? Because a Wiki (which TV tropes is) is neither of those things. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  17:56, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I found several somehow reliable sources about SatMH: https://www.google.com/search?q=strawinsky+and+the+mysterious+house+news+post&oq=strawinsky+and+the+mysterious+house+news+post&aqs=chrome..69i57.5531j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Check each of them to see if they're reliable or not. DarthonTheOverseer (talk) 09:07, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * - what particular ones? I clicked on the link and nothing overtly jumped out. Can you send specific links, so we can evaluate specific sources, or at least very clear details about what to go to after the google search? Nosebagbear (talk) 10:42, 5 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - non-notable film that has no reviews and hasn't even gotten on the radar of Rotten Tomatoes. No media coverage whatsover.  Fails WP:GNG.  Sole basis of notability is meme featuring character Globglogabgalab, so if anything was notable and deserving of an article it would be him.  However, a search for his name finds social media and blog comments about the meme with no corresponding mainstream media coverage, so also fails WP:GNG. TimTempleton (talk)  (cont)  17:28, 9 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.