Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strawpedo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 07:36, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Strawpedo

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Combination of a dictionary definition and a how-to guide, boh failing WP:NOT. No good sources per WP:ATT (both Urban dictionary and Everything.com are wikilike). It exists, but it has no encyclopedic value, no notability. Fails WP:ATT for lack of reliable secondary sources. Fram 12:03, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - seems like something that was made up one day. MER-C 12:15, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - this seems like something that probably is done somewhere and we just need to find some good sources for it. Its well written for the most part and, judging by the picture, does have some specilist following. Not much notability but definitely some. Prehaps a better name for the article rather than the colloquial dictionary definition. Think outside the box 12:48, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and thank the Wikigods that "seems like something that probably is done somewhere" is not a reason to keep an article. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:19, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:ATT. --Haemo 01:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.