Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Streamload


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. W.marsh 01:10, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Streamload


Has somehow managed to survive since June 2005, yet doesn't seem to pass WP:WEB, and if it does, it doesn't assert its notability very well. Seems a little spam-ish. Your thoughts? --Czj 22:28, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - spam city. The external link in the first sentence would see to that. Seems a candidate for db-spam under any other circumstance. Bubba hotep 23:19, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Looks like db-spam material. --- RockMFR 04:44, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. fits the "db-spam" (advert) criteria quite well.SkierRMH 07:33, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and rewrite to be less ad-like. This is the service Google is copying with GDrive. Streamload was one of the first online file storage services along with XDrive. Notable and innovative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk • contribs) 07:37, 15 November 2006
 * delete. No reputable refs to claims of fame. NY Times articles are just ads. May be recreated if reputable experts publications that specifically discuss its notability (not just mention in a long list of similars). Mukadderat 16:41, 16 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.