Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StreetDrone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 23:18, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

StreetDrone

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not yet notable--not actually produced and no way to know if it ever will be.  DGG ( talk ) 17:06, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   17:31, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   17:33, 16 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete-Fails WP:COMPANY.FITINDIA&#160;(talk) 18:11, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: per WP:TOOSOON. Alos, CSD A7 was declined based on recognition over a single available source 'The Drive' but I couldn't find any other credible secondary source; also, not sure why an article from The Express been cited as it does not speak of the subject at all. TopCipher (talk) 18:29, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Not encyclopedic notability. bd2412  T 21:04, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete disclosure: I declined the A7 : The single independent source is not enough to meet the notability policy for companies. As I discussed with DGG on their talk page, a far-too-soon article that's gotten no further coverage after The Drive. Appable (talk | contributions)  08:10, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * In light of primary contributor expressing an interest in continuing to work on this article, Draftify. I still stand that it's too soon, but drafting will allow the article to be updated until it's met notability requirements for mainspace publication. It's clear at any rate that since this company is very new, new independent sources will likely be available over time. Appable (talk | contributions) 13:30, 19 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Added in additional citation. Also from their twitter page and website so looks like production is actually happening, so I think this is the right time. JoeOxford (talk) 11:44, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Added in additional citations from other sources. JoeOxford (talk) 11:44, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Please do not cast multiple votes; kindly consider commenting instead. Thanks.TopCipher (talk) 12:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Apologies, I have now added some more relevant citations. JoeOxford (talk) 14:13, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Appreciate you taking the time in expanding your contributions but I'm a bit confused with the recent 2 references that have been added. 1. The Paddock Magazine has mentioned that "CREATING THE PRESTON EV STREETDRONE" on a December 2016 post while the subject was founded in April 2017? - Not quite sure if we're using the right reference here. 2. The Business Magazine post which was released yesterday (18 April, 2017) is a press release which again does not help establish claim of significance (which is required to establish notability). Might I recommend going through this essay here which states - no amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. TopCipher (talk) 14:51, 19 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.