Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Street Names of Los Santos in Grand Theft Auto V


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. per WP:SNOW ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  14:48, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Street Names of Los Santos in Grand Theft Auto V

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Pure listcruft and indiscriminate info, but I can't find a speedy deletion criteria that fits, so let's discuss. --Animalparty-- (talk) 03:42, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 03:46, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 03:47, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 03:47, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 03:47, 6 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Love, love, love this game, but yeah, this is the stuff for the Grand Theft Auto Wiki, not Wikipedia. Inappropriate as a standalone article, and while easily verifiable, may be overly detailed to merge into Grand Theft Auto V.-War wizard90 (talk) 03:49, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - per others —Мандичка YO 😜 18:18, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep It's a good article for those who want to know the street names. I think making the article was a good idea. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OlliePop119 (talk • contribs) 23:24, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced, and a thoroughly non-notable list. Fails WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:26, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete we really don't need a standalone article for this. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 05:11, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:42, 7 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. An indiscriminate collection of information without encyclopedic, significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. (?) czar ⨹   12:57, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:IINFO. A non-notable list that's a highly unlikely search term for a redirect. Egsan Bacon (talk) 19:52, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - per czar, a number of reasons to delete this unencyclopedic article of indiscriminate information.Dialectric (talk) 15:27, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.