Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Street Villains 13


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 23:15, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Street Villains 13

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a notable or recognized gang, single shooting event in 1987 does not constitute significant coverage. Severely unsourced and unverifiable. Not included in the FBI National Gang Threat Assessment. § FreeRangeFrog croak 18:19, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:01, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:01, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:01, 29 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (converse)  @ 09:20, 5 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Completely unsourced/unverified; no way should we have an article like this containing unverified allegations of criminal activity. The article names no names, so it is not speedyable as a BLP violation. --MelanieN (talk) 20:31, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * P.S. The article was created by two SPA users with virtually the same name: Lrenteria and Luisrenteria1; I see that an SPI has been filed. I also see that the article been created, speedied, and recreated several times which suggests that salting this title as well as Street Villains 13 Gang  might be in order. --MelanieN (talk) 20:42, 8 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. A local street gang doing what street gangs do. Reliable source coverage is limited to passing mentions. Nothing that rises to the level of WP:N/CA or WP:ORGDEPTH. • Gene93k (talk) 20:49, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.